[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d0npefb3.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:17:20 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
To: kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Robertson <danlrobertson89@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: gdb: redefine MS_RDONLY
Hi,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com> writes:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Thank you for the patch,
>
> On 15/02/2019 11:29, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Since commit e262e32d6bde0f77fb0c95d977482fc872c51996 "vfs: Suppress
>> MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled", the
>> generated gdb scripts can't be used anymore. That commit moved the
>> definition of MS_* flags but forgot to update gdb scripts to use the
>> new location. This patch includes <uapi/linux/mount.h> to
>> constants.py.in so gdb scripts are functional again.
>>
>> Fixes: e262e32d6bde "vfs: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled"
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in b/scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in
>> index 7aad82406422..c2a93805d911 100644
>> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in
>> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/fs.h>
>
> Do we still need linux/fs.h?
don't know enough about the tool to judge that. Just added the minimal
change to get it working again.
>> +#include <uapi/linux/mount.h>
>
> Perhaps this should go at the end to maintain alphabetical ordering?
>
>> #include <linux/mount.h>
>> #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>>
>
> We can see from Dan's patch - that the comment above the value
> definitions also needs to be updated...
>
> Felipe, you won the patch race - how would you like to handle this? Will
> you resubmit with changes? or should we just add the missing Fixes: tag
> to Dan's patch?
I don't mind either way, as long as the GDB scripts are working upstream :-)
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists