[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da1995fa-a362-dfe6-8184-7fcdf2b923e8@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:52:37 -0800
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, keescook@...gle.com,
mcgrof@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, joel@....id.au, mpe@...erman.id.au,
joe@...ches.com, brakmo@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Tim.Bird@...y.com, khilman@...libre.com, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, knut.omang@...cle.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com, amir73il@...il.com,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, wfg@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 08/17] kunit: test: add support for test abort
On 2/14/19 1:37 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases. Needed for
> implementing assertions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> ---
> Changes Since Last Version
> - This patch is new introducing a new cross-architecture way to abort
> out of a test case (needed for KUNIT_ASSERT_*, see next patch for
> details).
> - On a side note, this is not a complete replacement for the UML abort
> mechanism, but covers the majority of necessary functionality. UML
> architecture specific featurs have been dropped from the initial
> patchset.
> ---
> include/kunit/test.h | 24 +++++
> kunit/Makefile | 3 +-
> kunit/test-test.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kunit/test.c | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 353 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 kunit/test-test.c
< snip >
> diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
> index d18c50d5ed671..6e5244642ab07 100644
> --- a/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/kunit/test.c
> @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
> * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> */
>
> -#include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> -#include <os.h>
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <kunit/test.h>
>
> static bool kunit_get_success(struct kunit *test)
> @@ -32,6 +32,27 @@ static void kunit_set_success(struct kunit *test, bool success)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
> }
>
> +static bool kunit_get_death_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + bool death_test;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);
> + death_test = test->death_test;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
> +
> + return death_test;
> +}
> +
> +static void kunit_set_death_test(struct kunit *test, bool death_test)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);
> + test->death_test = death_test;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> static int kunit_vprintk_emit(const struct kunit *test,
> int level,
> const char *fmt,
> @@ -70,13 +91,29 @@ static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_stream *stream)
> stream->commit(stream);
> }
>
> +static void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + kunit_set_death_test(test, true);
> +
> + test->try_catch.throw(&test->try_catch);
> +
> + /*
> + * Throw could not abort from test.
> + */
> + kunit_err(test, "Throw could not abort from test!");
> + show_stack(NULL, NULL);
> + BUG();
kunit_abort() is what will be call as the result of an assert failure.
BUG(), which is a panic, which is crashing the system is not acceptable
in the Linux kernel. You will just annoy Linus if you submit this.
-Frank
< snip >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists