lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:49:40 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] wireless: mt76: call hweight8() instead of
 __sw_hweight8()

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:20:46PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> So Masahiro, could you hold your x86 patch for a while until the mt76
> patch will be in Linus' tree? That should not take more than two weeks,
> I think.

No hurry - I won't take it into the x86 now and queue it for 5.1 because
it is not something urgent or fixing a bug or so. It is a cleanup and as
such it can surely wait for 5.2, I'd say. Unless there are other aspects
which I'm not thinking of right now...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists