lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:49:48 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:38:55PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will
> > just create conflicts with my series..
> 
> I'll rebase on top of your patches once they are in. Or I can send both
> series as a single set.
> Preferences? 

So far there wasn't really much a reason to rebase my series, hope
this gets picked up either by Andrew or Al (not sure what the right
place is).  I think for now just rebase your series on top, we can
then figure out how to proceed.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists