lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190218133501.437460479@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:43:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        Wolfgang Walter <linux@...m.de>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Spock <dairinin@...il.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 70/92] Revert "mm: dont reclaim inodes with many attached pages"

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>

commit 69056ee6a8a3d576ed31e38b3b14c70d6c74edcc upstream.

This reverts commit a76cf1a474d7d ("mm: don't reclaim inodes with many
attached pages").

This change causes serious changes to page cache and inode cache
behaviour and balance, resulting in major performance regressions when
combining worklaods such as large file copies and kernel compiles.

  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202441

This change is a hack to work around the problems introduced by changing
how agressive shrinkers are on small caches in commit 172b06c32b94 ("mm:
slowly shrink slabs with a relatively small number of objects").  It
creates more problems than it solves, wasn't adequately reviewed or
tested, so it needs to be reverted.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190130041707.27750-2-david@fromorbit.com
Fixes: a76cf1a474d7d ("mm: don't reclaim inodes with many attached pages")
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Walter <linux@...m.de>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Spock <dairinin@...il.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/inode.c |    7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -730,11 +730,8 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate
 		return LRU_REMOVED;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Recently referenced inodes and inodes with many attached pages
-	 * get one more pass.
-	 */
-	if (inode->i_state & I_REFERENCED || inode->i_data.nrpages > 1) {
+	/* recently referenced inodes get one more pass */
+	if (inode->i_state & I_REFERENCED) {
 		inode->i_state &= ~I_REFERENCED;
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 		return LRU_ROTATE;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ