linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] staging: erofs: keep corrupted fs from crashing kernel in erofs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:41:36 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:     <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        <weidu.du@...wei.com>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Fang Wei <fangwei1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: erofs: keep corrupted fs from crashing kernel
 in erofs_namei()

On 2019/2/15 17:35, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 05:32:33PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/2/15 15:57, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 03:02:25PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2019/2/1 20:16, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>>>> +	/*
>>>>> +	 * on-disk error, let's only BUG_ON in the debugging mode.
>>>>> +	 * otherwise, it will return 1 to just skip the invalid name
>>>>> +	 * and go on (in consideration of the lookup performance).
>>>>> +	 */
>>>>> +	DBG_BUGON(qd->name > qd->end);
>>>>
>>>> qd->name == qd->end is not allowed as well?
>>>>
>>>> So will it be better to return directly here?
>>>>
>>>> 	if (unlikely(qd->name >= qd->end)) {
>>>> 		DBG_BUGON(1);
>>>> 		return 1;
>>>> 	}
>>>
>>> Please don't add likely/unlikely() annotations unless you have
>>> benchmarked it and it makes a difference.
>>
>> Well, it only occur for corrupted image, since the image is readonly, so it
>> is really rare.
> 
> The likely/unlikely() annotations make the code harder to read.  It's

Well, I think unlikely here can imply this is a rare case which may help to
read...

> only worth it if it's is a speedup on a fast path.

I guess unlikely here can help pipeline to load/execute right branch codes
instead of that rare branch one with BUGON(), is that right?

Thanks,

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> 
> .
>