[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190218133506.140415853@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:43:30 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Zachary Hays <zhays@...mark.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 64/85] mmc: block: handle complete_work on separate workqueue
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Zachary Hays <zhays@...mark.com>
commit dcf6e2e38a1c7ccbc535de5e1d9b14998847499d upstream.
The kblockd workqueue is created with the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag set.
This generates a rescuer thread for that queue that will trigger when
the CPU is under heavy load and collect the uncompleted work.
In the case of mmc, this creates the possibility of a deadlock when
there are multiple partitions on the device as other blk-mq work is
also run on the same queue. For example:
- worker 0 claims the mmc host to work on partition 1
- worker 1 attempts to claim the host for partition 2 but has to wait
for worker 0 to finish
- worker 0 schedules complete_work to release the host
- rescuer thread is triggered after time-out and collects the dangling
work
- rescuer thread attempts to complete the work in order starting with
claim host
- the task to release host is now blocked by a task to claim it and
will never be called
The above results in multiple hung tasks that lead to failures to
mount partitions.
Handling complete_work on a separate workqueue avoids this by keeping
the work completion tasks separate from the other blk-mq work. This
allows the host to be released without getting blocked by other tasks
attempting to claim the host.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Hays <zhays@...mark.com>
Fixes: 81196976ed94 ("mmc: block: Add blk-mq support")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 10 +++++++++-
include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
@@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_mq_req_done(struct m
if (waiting)
wake_up(&mq->wait);
else
- kblockd_schedule_work(&mq->complete_work);
+ queue_work(mq->card->complete_wq, &mq->complete_work);
return;
}
@@ -2928,6 +2928,13 @@ static int mmc_blk_probe(struct mmc_card
mmc_fixup_device(card, mmc_blk_fixups);
+ card->complete_wq = alloc_workqueue("mmc_complete",
+ WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+ if (unlikely(!card->complete_wq)) {
+ pr_err("Failed to create mmc completion workqueue");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
md = mmc_blk_alloc(card);
if (IS_ERR(md))
return PTR_ERR(md);
@@ -2991,6 +2998,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_remove(struct mmc_ca
pm_runtime_put_noidle(&card->dev);
mmc_blk_remove_req(md);
dev_set_drvdata(&card->dev, NULL);
+ destroy_workqueue(card->complete_wq);
}
static int _mmc_blk_suspend(struct mmc_card *card)
--- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
@@ -308,6 +308,7 @@ struct mmc_card {
unsigned int nr_parts;
unsigned int bouncesz; /* Bounce buffer size */
+ struct workqueue_struct *complete_wq; /* Private workqueue */
};
static inline bool mmc_large_sector(struct mmc_card *card)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists