linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is specified

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+_Xd_On1WsMV18dbjGEg6NGBcSAj4RSp=LX2ALisuXPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:57:28 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        SELinux <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is specified

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:46 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> My main concern is that "selinux={0|1}" continues to work as it has
> for years.  It doesn't look like this affects that, but I can't say
> I've dug into these changes very far.

Yup, no worries; it does. :)

-- 
Kees Cook