lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:43:06 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,, Kees Cook <>,
        Michael Ellerman <>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <>,
        Sasha Levin <>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 058/143] seq_buf: Make seq_buf_puts() null-terminate the buffer

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.


[ Upstream commit 0464ed24380905d640030d368cd84a4e4d1e15e2 ]

Currently seq_buf_puts() will happily create a non null-terminated
string for you in the buffer. This is particularly dangerous if the
buffer is on the stack.

For example:

  char buf[8];
  char secret = "secret";
  struct seq_buf s;

  seq_buf_init(&s, buf, sizeof(buf));
  seq_buf_puts(&s, "foo");
  printk("Message is %s\n", buf);

Can result in:

  Message is fooªªªªªsecret

We could require all users to memset() their buffer to zero before
use. But that seems likely to be forgotten and lead to bugs.

Instead we can change seq_buf_puts() to always leave the buffer in a
null-terminated state.

The only downside is that this makes the buffer 1 character smaller
for seq_buf_puts(), but that seems like a good trade off.


Acked-by: Kees Cook <>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <>
 lib/seq_buf.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/seq_buf.c b/lib/seq_buf.c
index 5c94e1012a91..cbef5ee4c459 100644
--- a/lib/seq_buf.c
+++ b/lib/seq_buf.c
@@ -143,9 +143,13 @@ int seq_buf_puts(struct seq_buf *s, const char *str)
 	WARN_ON(s->size == 0);
+	/* Add 1 to len for the trailing null byte which must be there */
+	len += 1;
 	if (seq_buf_can_fit(s, len)) {
 		memcpy(s->buffer + s->len, str, len);
-		s->len += len;
+		/* Don't count the trailing null byte against the capacity */
+		s->len += len - 1;
 		return 0;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists