[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190218133530.784715432@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:42:53 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 045/143] cw1200: Fix concurrency use-after-free bugs in cw1200_hw_scan()
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 4f68ef64cd7feb1220232bd8f501d8aad340a099 ]
The function cw1200_bss_info_changed() and cw1200_hw_scan() can be
concurrently executed.
The two functions both access a possible shared variable "frame.skb".
This shared variable is freed by dev_kfree_skb() in cw1200_upload_beacon(),
which is called by cw1200_bss_info_changed(). The free operation is
protected by a mutex lock "priv->conf_mutex" in cw1200_bss_info_changed().
In cw1200_hw_scan(), this shared variable is accessed without the
protection of the mutex lock "priv->conf_mutex".
Thus, concurrency use-after-free bugs may occur.
To fix these bugs, the original calls to mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex) and
mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex) are moved to the places, which can
protect the accesses to the shared variable.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/scan.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/scan.c
index bff81b8d4164..9f1037e7e55c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/scan.c
@@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ int cw1200_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
if (req->n_ssids > WSM_SCAN_MAX_NUM_OF_SSIDS)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* will be unlocked in cw1200_scan_work() */
+ down(&priv->scan.lock);
+ mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex);
+
frame.skb = ieee80211_probereq_get(hw, priv->vif->addr, NULL, 0,
req->ie_len);
if (!frame.skb)
@@ -86,19 +90,15 @@ int cw1200_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
if (req->ie_len)
memcpy(skb_put(frame.skb, req->ie_len), req->ie, req->ie_len);
- /* will be unlocked in cw1200_scan_work() */
- down(&priv->scan.lock);
- mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex);
-
ret = wsm_set_template_frame(priv, &frame);
if (!ret) {
/* Host want to be the probe responder. */
ret = wsm_set_probe_responder(priv, true);
}
if (ret) {
+ dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
up(&priv->scan.lock);
- dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
return ret;
}
@@ -120,10 +120,9 @@ int cw1200_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
++priv->scan.n_ssids;
}
- mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
-
if (frame.skb)
dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan.work);
return 0;
}
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists