[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190218133533.150455176@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:44:01 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 113/143] Revert "cifs: In Kconfig CONFIG_CIFS_POSIX needs depends on legacy (insecure cifs)"
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 60da90b224ba77a934decbb8129dabc861edd526 which is
commit 6e785302dad32228819d8066e5376acd15d0e6ba upstream.
Yi writes:
I notice that 4.4.169 merged 60da90b224ba7 ("cifs: In Kconfig
CONFIG_CIFS_POSIX needs depends on legacy (insecure cifs)") add
a Kconfig dependency CIFS_ALLOW_INSECURE_LEGACY, which was not
defined in 4.4 stable, so after this patch we are not able to
enable CIFS_POSIX anymore. Linux 4.4 stable didn't merge the
legacy dialects codes, so do we really need this patch for 4.4?
So revert this patch.
Reported-by: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Cc: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/cifs/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/cifs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/cifs/Kconfig
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ config CIFS_XATTR
config CIFS_POSIX
bool "CIFS POSIX Extensions"
- depends on CIFS && CIFS_ALLOW_INSECURE_LEGACY && CIFS_XATTR
+ depends on CIFS_XATTR
help
Enabling this option will cause the cifs client to attempt to
negotiate a newer dialect with servers, such as Samba 3.0.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists