linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190218161036.3ffad994@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:10:36 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the block tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got conflicts in:

  fs/exofs/ore.c
  fs/exofs/ore_raid.c

between commit:

  6dc4f100c175 ("block: allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over multi-page bvec")

from the block tree and commit:

  80f2121380ca ("scsi: fs: remove exofs")

from the scsi tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the files) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped