[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc48cfe9-3d01-8ab6-7bf0-a481b72f4a1a@web.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:12:11 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
Cc: Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@...mail.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@....com.cn>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [v6] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
>> Although we have tested these two methods in the existing kernel code,
>> considering the evolution of the kernel code, these special cases may occur, so we are willing to take them into account.
>> We plan to modify the code like this:
>>
>> id = of_find_device_by_node@p1(x)
>> -... when != e = id
>> +... when != e = (T)id
>> + when != id = (T)e
>
> This change is fine with me.
Thanks for another positive feedback on such software implementation details.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists