[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98bf31c1-16f2-1058-14e3-cf3e67be06f6@web.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:30:21 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@...mail.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@....com.cn>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [v6] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
>> Will corrections become relevant for specifications in (assignment) exclusions
>> of the second SmPL ellipsis in the discussed script?
>
> Let's do some experiments with the code in the current kernel.
It seems that you provided additional information for the adjustment
of when specifications according to the first SmPL ellipsis.
Other details are still in the waiting queue for the desired software clarification.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists