[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190219121420.GZ21884@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:44:20 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Long Cheng <long.cheng@...iatek.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
Zhenbao Liu <zhenbao.liu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] dmaengine: 8250_mtk_dma: add MediaTek uart DMA
support
On 14-02-19, 10:44, Long Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 12:51 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > +static int mtk_uart_apdma_device_pause(struct dma_chan *chan)
> > > +{
> > > + /* just for check caps pass */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > please remove, this is not a mandatory fn
>
> Can't remove it. Before the mail, i had explained it. in 8250 uart
> framework, will check the function..
I think you should fix the 8250 uart to handle driver not having a
pause. Keeping a dummy pause is just wrong and sets wrong expectations
for uart..
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists