[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190219132704.pmtai25fltxkwso6@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:27:04 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Qii Wang <qii.wang@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
leilk.liu@...iatek.com, ryder.lee@...iatek.com,
xinping.qian@...iatek.com, liguo.zhang@...iatek.com,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT8183 i2c binding
> > > Maybe you think that MT8183 SoC only has the I3C controllers. Actually,
> > > there are I2C and I3C controllers on MT8183 SoC. We will remove
> > > "mediatek,share-i3c" for I2C controller driver, so these patches are
> > > just to support the I2C controllers on MT8183 SoC. For the I3C
> > > controller we will send some new patches which are based on i3c
> > > framework directories(kernel/drivers/i3c), not based on
> > > i2c-mt65xx.c.
> >
> > Sounds perfect to me. If it turns out that the I3C driver can share
> > things with the I2C driver, we can discuss it then. But unless we have
> > an I3C driver and know for sure, the above strategy seems good to me.
> >
>
> Can I push the V4 patches of I2C controller driver now? or you just want
> an I3C driver that is compatible with the I2C controller?
If the V4 series does not use the "mediatek,share-i3c" binding anymore,
please resend it. From what I recall, it should be OK then.
> According to our plan, I2C controller will use
> i2c-mt65xx.c(kernel/drivers/i2c/busses/)and I3C controller will use
> i3c-xxx.c(kernel/drivers/i3c/master/)
Sounds OK from what I understood. The I2C fallback from I3C will be
interesting.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists