[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190219151608.1D51F608CD@smtp.codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:16:07 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@...vell.com>,
Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Karthik D A <karthida@...vell.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: don't advertise IBSS features without FW support
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> wrote:
> As it is, doing something like
>
> # iw phy phy0 interface add foobar type ibss
>
> on a firmware that doesn't have ad-hoc support just yields failures of
> HostCmd_CMD_SET_BSS_MODE, which happened to return a '-1' error code
> (-EPERM? not really right...) and sometimes may even crash the firmware
> along the way.
>
> Let's parse the firmware capability flag while registering the wiphy, so
> we don't allow attempting IBSS at all, and we get a proper -EOPNOTSUPP
> from nl80211 instead.
>
> Fixes: e267e71e68ae ("mwifiex: Disable adhoc feature based on firmware capability")
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.
6f21ab30469d mwifiex: don't advertise IBSS features without FW support
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10814041/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists