[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190219162716.04b0a54b@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:27:16 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] genirq/irqdomain: fall back to default domain
when creating hierarchy domain
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:57:23 +0100
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de> wrote:
Hi Thomas,
> When creating hierarchy domains use irq_default_domain as parent, if no
> parent was given by the caller. This avoids adding helper code for
> querying the underlying platform irq domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>
> ---
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 8b0be4bd6565..617c482d0778 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -1021,7 +1021,10 @@ struct irq_domain *irq_domain_create_hierarchy(struct irq_domain *parent,
> else
> domain = irq_domain_create_tree(fwnode, ops, host_data);
> if (domain) {
> - domain->parent = parent;
> + if (parent)
> + domain->parent = parent;
> + else
> + domain->parent = irq_default_domain;
> domain->flags |= flags;
> }
>
I'm really not keen on this. The whole "default domain" made sense at a
distant point in time (when irqdomains were new and platform code was
blissfully ignoring it), but it really looks like a sore spot in the
hierarchy code, which assumes that you always know what you're building
your hierarchy on top of.
It also create a small issue in the sense that you can create a root
domain using irq_domain_create_hierarchy() by passing NULL as the
parent. With this patch, the new domain now points to the default one,
with unexpected consequences.
So let's come back to first principles: How comes you can't obtain the
parent domain at creation time? Because I'd rather give you a way to
retrieve it instead if this.
M. (who wish he had an IP27!)
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists