[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1A7043D5F58CCB44A599DFD55ED4C9485C5B76C3@FMSMSX126.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:27:27 +0000
From: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 03/11] x86 topology: Add CPUID.1F multi-die/package
support
>> @@ -461,7 +463,7 @@ static bool match_llc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
>> */
>> static bool match_die(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
>> {
>> - if (c->>phys_proc_id == o->>phys_proc_id)
>> + if (c->>cpu_die_id == o->>cpu_die_id)
>> return true;
>> return false;
>> }
> Shouldn't we check the unique_die_id here?
> Die from different package can have the same cpu_die_id.
Good catch.
Updated this hunk as below.
Thanks!
-Len
@@ -461,7 +463,8 @@ static bool match_llc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
*/
static bool match_die(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
{
- if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id)
+ if ((c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id) &&
+ (c->cpu_die_id == o->cpu_die_id))
return true;
return false;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists