linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/5] EDAC/amd64: Adjust printed Chip Select sizes when interleaved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190219202536.15462-5-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:26:10 +0000
From:   "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
To:     "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] EDAC/amd64: Adjust printed Chip Select sizes when
 interleaved

From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>

AMD systems may support Chip Select interleaving. However, on Fam17h+
this was not taken into account when printing the Chip Select sizes.

Add support to detect if Chip Selects are interleaved on Fam17h+, and
adjust the sizes accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
---
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 656788699c64..073bfd112c44 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -784,6 +784,22 @@ static void debug_dump_dramcfg_low(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u32 dclr, int chan)
 		 (dclr & BIT(15)) ?  "yes" : "no");
 }
 
+/*
+ * The Address Mask should be a contiguous set of bits in the non-interleaved
+ * case. So to check for CS interleaving, find the most- and least-significant
+ * bits of the mask, generate a contiguous bitmask, and compare the two.
+ */
+static bool f17_cs_interleaved(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl, int cs)
+{
+	u32 mask = pvt->csels[ctrl].csmasks[cs >> 1];
+	u32 msb = fls(mask) - 1, lsb = ffs(mask) - 1;
+	u32 test_mask = GENMASK(msb, lsb);
+
+	edac_dbg(1, "mask=0x%08x test_mask=0x%08x\n", mask, test_mask);
+
+	return mask ^ test_mask;
+}
+
 static void debug_display_dimm_sizes_df(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl)
 {
 	int dimm, size0, size1, cs0, cs1;
@@ -800,8 +816,19 @@ static void debug_display_dimm_sizes_df(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl)
 		size1 = 0;
 		cs1 = dimm * 2 + 1;
 
-		if (csrow_enabled(cs1, ctrl, pvt))
-			size1 = pvt->ops->dbam_to_cs(pvt, ctrl, 0, cs1);
+		if (csrow_enabled(cs1, ctrl, pvt)) {
+			/*
+			 * CS interleaving is only supported if both CSes have
+			 * the same amount of memory. Because they are
+			 * interleaved, it will look like both CSes have the
+			 * full amount of memory. Save the size for both as
+			 * half the amount we found on CS0, if interleaved.
+			 */
+			if (f17_cs_interleaved(pvt, ctrl, cs1))
+				size1 = size0 = (size0 >> 1);
+			else
+				size1 = pvt->ops->dbam_to_cs(pvt, ctrl, 0, cs1);
+		}
 
 		amd64_info(EDAC_MC ": %d: %5dMB %d: %5dMB\n",
 				cs0,	size0,
-- 
2.17.1