[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1902191318520.6518@viisi.sifive.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul@...an.com, palmer@...ive.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: riscv: support kernel command line forcing when
no DTB passed
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Dez 17 2018, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > index 2c290e6aaa6e..e6b962ff39b1 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -171,7 +171,14 @@ asmlinkage void __init setup_vm(void)
> >
> > void __init parse_dtb(unsigned int hartid, void *dtb)
> > {
> > - early_init_dt_scan(__va(dtb));
> > + if (!early_init_dt_scan(__va(dtb)))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + pr_err("No DTB passed to the kernel\n");
>
> Isn't that backwards? early_init_dt_scan returns true if it found a
> DTB.
Yes, it's backwards. Thanks for the catch. Looks like I sent an older
version of the patch.
- Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists