[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190220000209.GA4091@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:02:10 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave P Martin <dave.martin@....com>
Subject: Re: xen/evtchn and forced threaded irq
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 05:31:10PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been looking at using Linux RT in Dom0. Once the guest is started,
> the console is ending to have a lot of warning (see trace below).
>
> After some investigation, this is because the irq handler will now be threaded.
> I can reproduce the same error with the vanilla Linux when passing the option
> 'threadirqs' on the command line (the trace below is from 5.0.0-rc7 that has
> not RT support).
>
> FWIW, the interrupt for port 6 is used to for the guest to communicate with
> xenstore.
>
> From my understanding, this is happening because the interrupt handler is now
> run in a thread. So we can have the following happening.
>
> Interrupt context | Interrupt thread
> |
> receive interrupt port 6 |
> clear the evtchn port |
> set IRQF_RUNTHREAD |
> kick interrupt thread |
> | clear IRQF_RUNTHREAD
> | call evtchn_interrupt
> receive interrupt port 6 |
> clear the evtchn port |
> set IRQF_RUNTHREAD |
> kick interrupt thread |
> | disable interrupt port 6
> | evtchn->enabled = false
> | [....]
> |
> | *** Handling the second interrupt ***
> | clear IRQF_RUNTHREAD
> | call evtchn_interrupt
> | WARN(...)
>
> I am not entirely sure how to fix this. I have two solutions in mind:
>
> 1) Prevent the interrupt handler to be threaded. We would also need to
> switch from spin_lock to raw_spin_lock as the former may sleep on RT-Linux.
>
> 2) Remove the warning
I think access to evtchn->enabled is racy so (with or without the warning) we can't use it reliably.
Another alternative could be to queue the irq if !evtchn->enabled and handle it in evtchn_write() (which is where irq is supposed to be re-enabled).
-boris
>
> None of them are ideals. Do you have an opionion/better suggestion?
>
> [ 127.192087] Interrupt for port 6, but apparently not enabled; per-user 0000000078d39c7f
> [ 127.200333] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2553 at drivers/xen/evtchn.c:167 evtchn_interrupt+0xfc/0x120
> [ 127.208799] Modules linked in:
> [ 127.211939] CPU: 0 PID: 2553 Comm: irq/52-evtchn:x Tainted: G W
> 5.0.0-rc7-00023-g2a3d41623699 #1257
> [ 127.222374] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT)
> [ 127.228381] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO)
> [ 127.233256] pc : evtchn_interrupt+0xfc/0x120
> [ 127.237607] lr : evtchn_interrupt+0xfc/0x120
> [ 127.241952] sp : ffff000012d2bd60
> [ 127.245347] x29: ffff000012d2bd60 x28: ffff00001015d608
> [ 127.250741] x27: ffff8008b39de400 x26: ffff00001015d330
> [ 127.256137] x25: ffff00001015d2d4 x24: 0000000000000001
> [ 127.261532] x23: ffff00001015d570 x22: 0000000000000034
> [ 127.266926] x21: 0000000000000000 x20: ffff8008b7f02400
> [ 127.272322] x19: ffff8008b3aba000 x18: 0000000000000037
> [ 127.277717] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> [ 127.283112] x15: 00000000fffffff0 x14: 0000000000000000
> [ 127.288507] x13: 3030303030207265 x12: 000000000000000c
> [ 127.293902] x11: ffff000010ea0a88 x10: 0000000000000000
> [ 127.299297] x9 : 00000000fffb9fff x8 : 0000000000000000
> [ 127.304701] x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : ffff8008bac5c240
> [ 127.310087] x5 : ffff8008bac5c240 x4 : 0000000000000000
> [ 127.315483] x3 : ffff8008bac64708 x2 : ffff8008b39de400
> [ 127.320877] x1 : 893ac9b38837b800 x0 : 0000000000000000
> [ 127.326272] Call trace:
> [ 127.328802] evtchn_interrupt+0xfc/0x120
> [ 127.332804] irq_forced_thread_fn+0x38/0x98
> [ 127.337066] irq_thread+0x190/0x238
> [ 127.340636] kthread+0x134/0x138
> [ 127.343942] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
> [ 127.347593] ---[ end trace 1d3fa385877cc18b ]---
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Julien Grall
Powered by blists - more mailing lists