lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:47:20 -0800
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, shuah@...nel.org,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, brakmo@...com,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Bird, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
        Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 18/19] of: unittest: split out a couple of test cases
 from unittest

On 2/20/19 12:44 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2/18/19 2:25 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 2/15/19 2:56 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:05 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/14/19 4:56 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 3:57 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/5/18 3:54 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:58 AM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
> 
> < snip >
> 
>>
>> It makes it harder for me to read the source of the tests and
>> understand the order they will execute.  It also makes it harder
>> for me to read through the actual tests (in this example the
>> tests that are currently grouped in of_unittest_find_node_by_name())
>> because of all the extra function headers injected into the
>> existing single function to break it apart into many smaller
>> functions.
> 
> < snip >
> 
>>>>> This is not something I feel particularly strongly about, it is just
>>>>> pretty atypical from my experience to have so many unrelated test
>>>>> cases in a single file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you would prefer that I break up the test cases first, and then
>>>>> we split up the file as appropriate?
>>>>
>>>> I prefer that the test cases not be broken up arbitrarily.  There _may_
> 
> I expect that I created confusion by putting this in a reply to patch 18/19.
> It is actually a comment about patch 19/19.  Sorry about that.
> 
> 
>>>
>>> I wasn't trying to break them up arbitrarily. I thought I was doing it
>>> according to a pattern (breaking up the file, that is), but maybe I
>>> just hadn't looked at enough examples.
>>
>> This goes back to the kunit model of putting each test into a separate
>> function that can be a KUNIT_CASE().  That is a model that I do not agree
>> with for devicetree.
> 
> So now that I am actually talking about patch 19/19, let me give a concrete
> example.  I will cut and paste (after my comments), the beginning portion
> of base-test.c, after applying patch 19/19 (the "base version".  Then I
> will cut and paste my alternative version which does not break the tests
> down into individual functions (the "frank version").
> 
> I will also reply to this email with the base version and the frank version
> as attachments, which will make it easier to save as separate versions
> for easier viewing.  I'm not sure if an email with attachments will make
> it through the list servers, but I am cautiously optimistic.

base_version and frank_version attached.

-Frank


> 
> I am using v4 of the patch series because I never got v3 to cleanly apply
> and it is not a constructive use of my time to do so since I have v4 applied.
> 
> One of the points I was trying to make is that readability suffers from the
> approach taken by patches 18/19 and 19/19.
> 
> The base version contains the extra text of a function header for each
> unit test.  This is visual noise and makes the file larger.  It is also
> one more possible location of an error (although not likely).
> 
> The frank version has converted each of the new function headers into
> a comment, using the function name with '_' converted to ' '.  The
> comments are more readable than the function headers.  Note that I added
> an extra blank line before each comment, which violates the kernel
> coding standards, but I feel this makes the code more readable.
> 
> The base version needs to declare each of the individual test functions
> in of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[]. It is possible that a test function
> could be left out of of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[], in error.  This
> will result in a compile warning (I think warning instead of error, but
> I have not verified that) so the error might be caught or it might be
> overlooked.
> 
> In the base version, the order of execution of the test code requires
> bouncing back and forth between the test functions and the coding of
> of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[].
> 
> In the frank version the order of execution of the test code is obvious.
> 
> It is possible that a test function could be left out of
> of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[], in error.  This will result in a compile
> warning (I think warning instead of error, but I have not verified that)
> so it might be caught or it might be overlooked.
> 
> The base version is 265 lines.  The frank version is 208 lines, 57 lines
> less.  Less is better.
> 
> 
> ## ==========  base version  ====================================
> 
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
>  * Unit tests for functions defined in base.c.
>  */
> #include <linux/of.h>
> 
> #include <kunit/test.h>
> 
> #include "test-common.h"
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_basic(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *name;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
> 	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
> 			       "find /testcase-data failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 	kfree(name);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	/* Test if trailing '/' works */
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
> 			    "trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
> 
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *name;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
> 		test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
> 		"find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 	kfree(name);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *name;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
> 			       "find testcase-alias failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 	kfree(name);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	/* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
> 			   "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
> }
> 
> /*
>  * TODO(brendanhiggins@...gle.com): This looks like a duplicate of
>  * of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components
>  */
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *name;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
> 		test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
> 		"find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 	kfree(name);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> 		test,
> 		np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"), NULL,
> 		"non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> 		test, np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
> 		"non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path(
> 		struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> 		test,
> 		np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"), NULL,
> 		"non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
> 		np);
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *options;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
> 			       "option path test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *options;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
> 			       "option path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data/testcase-device1:test/option", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
> 			       "option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
> 					 "NULL option path test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *options;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
> 				       &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
> 			       "option alias path test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash(
> 		struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *options;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
> 				       &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
> 			       "option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
> 			test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *options;
> 
> 	options = "testoption";
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
> 			    "option clearing test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *options;
> 
> 	options = "testoption";
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
> 			    "option clearing root node test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static int of_test_find_node_by_name_init(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	/* adding data for unittest */
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
> 
> 	if (!of_aliases)
> 		of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
> 
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
> 			"/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> static struct kunit_case of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[] = {
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_basic),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root),
> 	{},
> };
> 
> static struct kunit_module of_test_find_node_by_name_module = {
> 	.name = "of-test-find-node-by-name",
> 	.init = of_test_find_node_by_name_init,
> 	.test_cases = of_test_find_node_by_name_cases,
> };
> module_test(of_test_find_node_by_name_module);
> 
> 
> ## ==========  frank version  ===================================
> 
> 	// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
>  * Unit tests for functions defined in base.c.
>  */
> #include <linux/of.h>
> 
> #include <kunit/test.h>
> 
> #include "test-common.h"
> 
> static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	struct device_node *np;
> 	const char *options, *name;
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name basic
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
> 	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
> 			       "find /testcase-data failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 	kfree(name);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name trailing slash
> 
> 	/* Test if trailing '/' works */
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
> 			    "trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name multiple components
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
> 		test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
> 		"find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 	kfree(name);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name with alias
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
> 			       "find testcase-alias failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 	kfree(name);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name with alias and slash
> 
> 	/* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
> 			    "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name multiple components 2
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
> 		test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
> 		"find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 	kfree(name);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name missing path
> 
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> 		test,
> 		np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"), NULL,
> 		"non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name missing alias
> 
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> 		test, np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
> 		"non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	//  find node by name missing alias with relative path
> 
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> 		test,
> 		np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"), NULL,
> 		"non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
> 		np);
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name with option
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
> 			       "option path test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name with option and slash
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
> 			       "option path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data/testcase-device1:test/option", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
> 			       "option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name with null option
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
> 					 "NULL option path test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name with option alias
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
> 				       &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
> 			       "option alias path test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name with option alias and slash
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
> 				       &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
> 			       "option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name with null option alias
> 
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
> 			test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name option clearing
> 
> 	options = "testoption";
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
> 			    "option clearing test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> 
> 
> 	// find node by name option clearing root
> 
> 	options = "testoption";
> 	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
> 			    "option clearing root node test failed\n");
> 	of_node_put(np);
> }
> 
> static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> {
> 	/* adding data for unittest */
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
> 
> 	if (!of_aliases)
> 		of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
> 
> 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
> 			"/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> static struct kunit_case of_test_cases[] = {
> 	KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_find_node_by_name),
> 	{},
> };
> 
> static struct kunit_module of_test_module = {
> 	.name = "of-base-test",
> 	.init = of_test_init,
> 	.test_cases = of_test_cases,
> };
> module_test(of_test_module);
> 
> 
>>
>>
>>>> be cases where the devicetree unittests are currently not well grouped
>>>> and may benefit from change, but if so that should be handled independently
>>>> of any transformation into a KUnit framework.
>>>
>>> I agree. I did this because I wanted to illustrate what I thought real
>>> world KUnit unit tests should look like (I also wanted to be able to
>>> show off KUnit test features that help you write these kinds of
>>> tests); I was not necessarily intending that all the of: unittest
>>> patches would get merged in with the whole RFC. I was mostly trying to
>>> create cause for discussion (which it seems like I succeeded at ;-) ).
>>>
>>> So fair enough, I will propose these patches separately and later
>>> (except of course this one that splits up the file). Do you want the
>>> initial transformation to the KUnit framework in the main KUnit
>>> patchset, or do you want that to be done separately? If I recall, Rob
>>> suggested this as a good initial example that other people could refer
>>> to, and some people seemed to think that I needed one to help guide
>>> the discussion and provide direction for early users. I don't
>>> necessarily think that means the initial real world example needs to
>>> be a part of the initial patchset though.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


View attachment "base_version" of type "text/plain" (7966 bytes)

View attachment "frank_version" of type "text/plain" (5647 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists