[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190220040827.136184-2-joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:08:23 -0500
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, paulmck@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC 1/5] net: rtnetlink: Fix incorrect RCU API usage
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
rtnl_register_internal() and rtnl_unregister_all tries to directly
dereference an RCU protected pointed outside RCU read side section.
While this is Ok to do since a lock is held, let us use the correct
API to avoid programmer bugs in the future.
This also fixes sparse warnings arising from not using RCU API.
net/core/rtnetlink.c:332:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment
(different address spaces) net/core/rtnetlink.c:332:13: expected
struct rtnl_link **tab net/core/rtnetlink.c:332:13: got struct
rtnl_link *[noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
---
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 5ea1bed08ede..98be4b4818a9 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int rtnl_register_internal(struct module *owner,
msgindex = rtm_msgindex(msgtype);
rtnl_lock();
- tab = rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol];
+ tab = rtnl_dereference(rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol]);
if (tab == NULL) {
tab = kcalloc(RTM_NR_MSGTYPES, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tab)
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ void rtnl_unregister_all(int protocol)
BUG_ON(protocol < 0 || protocol > RTNL_FAMILY_MAX);
rtnl_lock();
- tab = rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol];
+ tab = rtnl_dereference(rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol]);
if (!tab) {
rtnl_unlock();
return;
--
2.21.0.rc0.258.g878e2cd30e-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists