linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.20 00/92] 4.20.11-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190220090453.GA29215@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:04:53 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.20 00/92] 4.20.11-stable review

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 09:39:11AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/18/19 5:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.20.11 release.
> > There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 20 13:34:25 UTC 2019.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 159 pass: 156 fail: 3
> Failed builds:
> 	csky:defconfig
> 	csky:allnoconfig
> 	csky:tinyconfig
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 343 pass: 343 fail: 0
> 
> 
> Building csky:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> mm/memory.c: In function ‘__pte_alloc’:
> mm/memory.c:406:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘pte_alloc_one’
> 
> Commit d6caf1d0d553 ("csky: fixup compile error with pte_alloc")
> (upstream patch 2a60aa14a9a) needs to be removed; the offending patch
> is not in v4.20.y.
> 
> The automatic scripts seem to be a bit too aggressive.

Thanks for finding this.  I'll drop it before I do the release.  And
thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h