[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190220095252.GA9089@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:52:52 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 20
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 05:11:15PM +0800, Zhangshaokun wrote:
> There is a compiler failure on arm64 platform, as follow:
>
> AS arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.o
> CC kernel/trace/ring_buffer.o
> In file included from security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:30:0:
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h:176:7: error: redeclaration of enumerator ‘NONE’
> hook(NONE) \
> ^
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h:188:34: note: in definition of macro ‘__ima_hook_enumify’
> #define __ima_hook_enumify(ENUM) ENUM,
> ^
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h:191:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__ima_hooks’
> __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_enumify)
> ^
> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h:15:0,
> from ./include/acpi/acpi_io.h:7,
> from ./include/linux/acpi.h:47,
> from ./include/linux/tpm.h:26,
> from security/integrity/ima/ima.h:25,
> from security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:30:
> ./include/linux/efi.h:1716:2: note: previous definition of ‘NONE’ was here
> NONE,
> ^
> scripts/Makefile.build:276: recipe for target 'security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o' failed
> make[3]: *** [security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o] Error 1
>
> I dug it and it is the commit 901615cb916d ("tpm: move tpm_chip definition to include/linux/tpm.h")
This results from a new include in tpm.h:
#include <linux/acpi.h>
Must be fixed either in include/linux/efi.h or security/integrity/ima.h as
those files have a name collision. Makes me wonder why neither has taken
care of prefixing the constants properly.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists