[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA93ih2t34qwVB==LoF2odOCEOd9EE06i3hz0eTuonnXjJCyDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:16:14 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Sugaya, Taichi" <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com>,
Shinji Kanematsu <kanematsu.shinji@...ionext.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>, soc@...nel.org,
Takao Orito <orito.takao@...ionext.com>,
Kazuhiro Kasai <kasai.kazuhiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] ARM: configs: Add Milbeaut M10V defconfig
Hi Arnd,
2019年2月20日(水) 21:28 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 12:27 PM Sugaya, Taichi
> <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On 2019/02/20 18:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:44 AM Sugaya Taichi
> > > <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/milbeaut_m10v_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/milbeaut_m10v_defconfig
> > >> new file mode 100644
> > >> index 0000000..a263211
> > >> --- /dev/null
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/milbeaut_m10v_defconfig
> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
> > >
> > > I no longer see anything here that should be turned off, but you
> > > might want to run 'make savedefconfig' and use the output of that,
> > > to make it easier to keep it up to date.
> > >
> >
> > I got it, I use the output of 'make savedefconfig'.
> > One question, is that OK to add some options on it?
> > -Because "CONFIG_ARCH_MILBEAUT" was not listed.
>
> What I'd do here is to apply all the patches you want to get merged in
> the next few releases before running 'savedefconfig' and use the output
> of that.
Let me check. Would you mean that the defconfig will include all those
drivers configs, which will not appear at this moment?
> If you already know that you will need the options, including
> them now means you don't have to update the defconfig file
> as much in the future.
I just concern that if other subsystem maintainer comments
on the config name. Even in that case, can we just update the
defconfig with new name?
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists