[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190220134344.nnukjlxh3nkcqy4c@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:43:44 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, stable@...nel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] panic: Avoid the extra noise dmesg
On Fri 2019-02-15 13:56:54, Feng Tang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:32:30AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Mon 2018-12-10 10:49:22, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:17 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:51:19 +0800
> > > > Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > When kernel panic happens, it will first print the panic call stack,
> > > > > then the ending msg like:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 35.743249] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> > > > > [ 35.749975] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > >
> > > > > The above message are very useful for debugging.
> > > > >
> > > > > But if system is configured to not reboot on panic, say the "panic_timeout"
> > > > > parameter equals 0, it will likely print out many noisy message like
> > > > > WARN() call stack for each and every CPU except the panic one, messages
> > > > > like below:
>
> So currently, there are 2 proposals:
> 1. this v4 patch of "panic_keep_irq_on" flag (default off to be same
> as the current kernel behavior)
> 2. Petr's suggestion of adding a flag to suppress printk after enterring
> late panic phase (blinking time), while keeping the sysrq printk
> working.
>
> Following is the draft patch based on Petr's suggestion:
>
> Please review, thanks. I'm fine with both solutions.
>
> - Feng
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> index 1f03078..8921fed 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> @@ -528,6 +528,11 @@ void __handle_sysrq(int key, bool check_mask)
> struct sysrq_key_op *op_p;
> int orig_log_level;
> int i;
> + int old_val;
> +
> + /* save the old panic printk flag */
The comment is not needed. It is obvious.
> + old_val = panic_suppress_printk;
s/old_val/orig_panic_suppress_printk/ to follow
the naming of orig_log_level.
> + panic_suppress_printk = 1;
We want to enable the messages in sysrq. This should be:
panic_suppress_printk = 0;
> rcu_sysrq_start();
> rcu_read_lock();
> @@ -574,6 +579,8 @@ void __handle_sysrq(int key, bool check_mask)
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> rcu_sysrq_end();
> +
> + panic_suppress_printk = old_val;
> }
>
> void handle_sysrq(int key)
> diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> index f121e6b..0cd3a1b 100644
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -326,6 +328,7 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
> }
> #endif
> pr_emerg("---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: %s ]---\n", buf);
/* Do not scroll important messages with errors from blinking code. */
> + panic_suppress_printk = 1;
> local_irq_enable();
> for (i = 0; ; i += PANIC_TIMER_STEP) {
> touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index d3d1703..c27bbf5 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -1987,6 +1987,9 @@ asmlinkage __visible int printk(const char *fmt, ...)
> va_list args;
> int r;
/* Suppress messages from panic blinking code. */
> + if (unlikely(panic_suppress_printk))
> + return 0;
This should go to vprintk_emit() so that it works for all
printk() interfaces.
> +
> va_start(args, fmt);
> r = vprintk_func(fmt, args);
> va_end(args);
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists