[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be1f988c-5b2f-91cf-d210-1e28c09f106f@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:45:17 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Nikolaus Voss <nv@...n.de>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] usb: typec: tps6598x: handle block writes separately
with plain-I2C adapters
On 2/20/19 4:57 AM, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
> Commit 1a2f474d328f handles block _reads_ separately with plain-I2C
> adapters, but the problem described with regmap-i2c not handling
> SMBus block transfers (i.e. read and writes) correctly also exists
> with writes.
>
> As workaround, this patch adds a block write function the same way
> 1a2f474d328f adds a block read function.
>
> Fixes: 1a2f474d328f ("usb: typec: tps6598x: handle block reads separately with plain-I2C adapters")
> Fixes: 0a4c005bd171 ("usb: typec: driver for TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controllers")
> Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de>
> ---
> v2: fix tps6598x_exec_cmd also
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c
> index c84c8c189e90..c54b73fb2a2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,20 @@ tps6598x_block_read(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg, void *val, size_t len)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int tps6598x_block_write(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg,
> + void *val, size_t len)
> +{
> + u8 data[len + 1];
> +
You should use TPS_MAX_LEN + 1 here to avoid the variable length array.
See upstream commit 0bb95f80a38f8 ("Makefile: Globally enable VLA warning")
and 8d361fa2c29dc ("usb: typec: tps6598x: Remove VLA usage"). Not sure if
the WARN_ON introduced by 8d361fa2c29dc is really needed; I dislike
unnecessary runtime checks.
Guenter
> + if (!tps->i2c_protocol)
> + return regmap_raw_write(tps->regmap, reg, val, len);
> +
> + data[0] = len;
> + memcpy(&data[1], val, len);
> +
> + return regmap_raw_write(tps->regmap, reg, data, sizeof(data));
> +}
> +
> static inline int tps6598x_read16(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg, u16 *val)
> {
> return tps6598x_block_read(tps, reg, val, sizeof(u16));
> @@ -127,23 +141,23 @@ static inline int tps6598x_read64(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg, u64 *val)
>
> static inline int tps6598x_write16(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg, u16 val)
> {
> - return regmap_raw_write(tps->regmap, reg, &val, sizeof(u16));
> + return tps6598x_block_write(tps, reg, &val, sizeof(u16));
> }
>
> static inline int tps6598x_write32(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg, u32 val)
> {
> - return regmap_raw_write(tps->regmap, reg, &val, sizeof(u32));
> + return tps6598x_block_write(tps, reg, &val, sizeof(u32));
> }
>
> static inline int tps6598x_write64(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg, u64 val)
> {
> - return regmap_raw_write(tps->regmap, reg, &val, sizeof(u64));
> + return tps6598x_block_write(tps, reg, &val, sizeof(u64));
> }
>
> static inline int
> tps6598x_write_4cc(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg, const char *val)
> {
> - return regmap_raw_write(tps->regmap, reg, &val, sizeof(u32));
> + return tps6598x_block_write(tps, reg, &val, sizeof(u32));
> }
>
> static int tps6598x_read_partner_identity(struct tps6598x *tps)
> @@ -229,8 +243,8 @@ static int tps6598x_exec_cmd(struct tps6598x *tps, const char *cmd,
> return -EBUSY;
>
> if (in_len) {
> - ret = regmap_raw_write(tps->regmap, TPS_REG_DATA1,
> - in_data, in_len);
> + ret = tps6598x_block_write(tps, TPS_REG_DATA1,
> + in_data, in_len);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists