lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:22:00 +0100 (CET)
From:   Nikolaus Voss <nv@...n.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] usb: typec: tps6598x: handle block writes separately
 with plain-I2C adapters

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:57:30PM +0100, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
>> Commit 1a2f474d328f handles block _reads_ separately with plain-I2C
>> adapters, but the problem described with regmap-i2c not handling
>> SMBus block transfers (i.e. read and writes) correctly also exists
>> with writes.
>>
>> As workaround, this patch adds a block write function the same way
>> 1a2f474d328f adds a block read function.
>>
>> Fixes: 1a2f474d328f ("usb: typec: tps6598x: handle block reads separately with plain-I2C adapters")
>> Fixes: 0a4c005bd171 ("usb: typec: driver for TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controllers")
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de>
>> ---
>
> As was pointed out, you have to have a From: that matches a
> signed-off-by somewhere here.  If your company email systems is horrid
> and can not handle patches, then put the correct from: line as the first
> line of the commit message as the documentation says and all will be
> good.
>
>
>
>> v2: fix tps6598x_exec_cmd also
>> ---
>>  drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c
>> index c84c8c189e90..c54b73fb2a2f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c
>> @@ -110,6 +110,20 @@ tps6598x_block_read(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg, void *val, size_t len)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int tps6598x_block_write(struct tps6598x *tps, u8 reg,
>> +				void *val, size_t len)
>> +{
>> +	u8 data[len + 1];
>
> I thought the build system now warned when you did this :(

I must admit I'm developing on 4.19 stable series, so no warnings...

Nikolaus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists