[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190220114217.02281bd6@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:42:17 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kprobe: Do not use uaccess functions to access
kernel memory that can fault
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 01:04:53 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > What about just adding 'u' to the end of the offset? Say you have a
> > data structure in kernel space that has a field in user space you want
> > to reference?
> >
> >
> > field_val=+8u(+0(%si))
>
> Ah, that looks good :~) thank you for this idea!
<bike-shed>
Hmm, I wonder if we should make it +u8 or u+8? as +8u may be confused
as unsigned? Like 8ULL. I don't know. Kernel developers suck at
naming :-p
</bike-shed>
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists