[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190221115426.f616100906d989eda93d66dc@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:54:26 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test_firmware: silence underflow warning in
test_dev_config_update_u8()
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:18:56 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:54:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 21:38:26 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We put an upper bound on "new" but we don't check for negatives.
> >
> > U8_MAX has unsigned type, so `if (new > U8_MAX)' does check for negative.
> >
>
> No, doesn't work in this case.
>
> #define U8_MAX ((u8)~0U)
>
> It would need to unsigned long for the type promotion to prevent
> negatives, but it starts as unsigned int, then unsigned char, which is
> type promoted to int.
OK.
> It would be more clear to just write it as:
>
> #define U8_MAX 0xff
That doesn't work either. Tricky.
#include <stdio.h>
typedef unsigned char u8;
#define U8_MAX 0xff
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
long new;
new = -20;
if (new > U8_MAX)
printf("over\n");
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists