[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8100608f-0f8b-7f67-bfa1-9f6c4de03fec@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:08:15 -0700
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Fix incorrect struct size for memory allocation
On 2/21/2019 2:54 PM, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> The allocation for the clock bulk data does a classic sizeof(pointer)
> instead of sizeof(struct) so the array ends up incorrectly sized
> for the clock data.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 8e54eea ("drm/msm: Add a helper function to parse clock names")
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> index 906b2bb..31e1481 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ int msm_clk_bulk_get(struct device *dev, struct clk_bulk_data **bulk)
> if (count < 1)
> return 0;
>
> - local = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(struct clk_bulk_data *),
> + local = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(struct clk_bulk_data),
> count, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!local)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
Isn't msm_clk_bulk_get a duplication of devm_clk_bulk_get_all() ?
Surely it would be better to just use that instead?
--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists