lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190221002809.GC24489@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:28:09 -0500
From:   Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hmm: improve and rename hmm_vma_get_pfns() to
 hmm_range_snapshot()

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:25:07PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 1/29/19 8:54 AM, jglisse@...hat.com wrote:
> > From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> > 
> > Rename for consistency between code, comments and documentation. Also
> > improves the comments on all the possible returns values. Improve the
> > function by returning the number of populated entries in pfns array.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
> > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/hmm.h |  4 ++--
> >   mm/hmm.c            | 23 ++++++++++-------------
> >   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Hi Jerome,
> 
> After applying the entire patchset, I still see a few hits of the old name,
> in Documentation:
> 
> $ git grep -n hmm_vma_get_pfns
> Documentation/vm/hmm.rst:192:  int hmm_vma_get_pfns(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> Documentation/vm/hmm.rst:205:The first one (hmm_vma_get_pfns()) will only
> fetch present CPU page table
> Documentation/vm/hmm.rst:224:      ret = hmm_vma_get_pfns(vma, &range,
> start, end, pfns);
> include/linux/hmm.h:145: * HMM pfn value returned by hmm_vma_get_pfns() or
> hmm_vma_fault() will be:
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> > index bd6e058597a6..ddf49c1b1f5e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> > @@ -365,11 +365,11 @@ void hmm_mirror_unregister(struct hmm_mirror *mirror);
> >    * table invalidation serializes on it.
> >    *
> >    * YOU MUST CALL hmm_vma_range_done() ONCE AND ONLY ONCE EACH TIME YOU CALL
> > - * hmm_vma_get_pfns() WITHOUT ERROR !
> > + * hmm_range_snapshot() WITHOUT ERROR !
> >    *
> >    * IF YOU DO NOT FOLLOW THE ABOVE RULE THE SNAPSHOT CONTENT MIGHT BE INVALID !
> >    */
> > -int hmm_vma_get_pfns(struct hmm_range *range);
> > +long hmm_range_snapshot(struct hmm_range *range);
> >   bool hmm_vma_range_done(struct hmm_range *range);
> > diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> > index 74d69812d6be..0d9ecd3337e5 100644
> > --- a/mm/hmm.c
> > +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> > @@ -706,23 +706,19 @@ static void hmm_pfns_special(struct hmm_range *range)
> >   }
> >   /*
> > - * hmm_vma_get_pfns() - snapshot CPU page table for a range of virtual addresses
> > - * @range: range being snapshotted
> > + * hmm_range_snapshot() - snapshot CPU page table for a range
> > + * @range: range
> >    * Returns: -EINVAL if invalid argument, -ENOMEM out of memory, -EPERM invalid
> 
> Channeling Mike Rapoport, that should be @Return: instead of Returns: , but...
> 
> 
> > - *          vma permission, 0 success
> > + *          permission (for instance asking for write and range is read only),
> > + *          -EAGAIN if you need to retry, -EFAULT invalid (ie either no valid
> > + *          vma or it is illegal to access that range), number of valid pages
> > + *          in range->pfns[] (from range start address).
> 
> ...actually, that's a little hard to spot that we're returning number of
> valid pages. How about:
> 
>  * @Returns: number of valid pages in range->pfns[] (from range start
>  *           address). This may be zero. If the return value is negative,
>  *           then one of the following values may be returned:
>  *
>  *           -EINVAL  range->invalid is set, or range->start or range->end
>  *                    are not valid.
>  *           -EPERM   For example, asking for write, when the range is
>  *      	      read-only
>  *           -EAGAIN  Caller needs to retry
>  *           -EFAULT  Either no valid vma exists for this range, or it is
>  *                    illegal to access the range
> 
> (caution: my white space might be wrong with respect to tabs)

Will do a documentation patch to improve things and remove leftover.

Cheers,
Jérôme

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ