[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKnpOdDiCaW9ntkNof+Ji7+HPaQqEk=ou-hWnw-BJxMGTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:44:11 -0500
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] powercap/intel_rapl: Support multi-die/package
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:02 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > list_for_each_entry(rp, &rapl_packages, plist) {
> > @@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ static void rapl_remove_package(struct rapl_package *rp)
> > /* called from CPU hotplug notifier, hotplug lock held */
> > static struct rapl_package *rapl_add_package(int cpu)
> > {
> > - int id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> > + int id = topology_unique_die_id(cpu);
> > struct rapl_package *rp;
> > int ret;
>
> And now your new function names are misnomers.
That is fair.
Seems that a subsequent re-name-only patch is appropriate.
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists