[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <010ca462-a245-8bec-c2eb-8af21d087486@socionext.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:36:14 +0900
From: "Sugaya, Taichi" <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Shinji Kanematsu <kanematsu.shinji@...ionext.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>, soc@...nel.org,
Takao Orito <orito.takao@...ionext.com>,
Kazuhiro Kasai <kasai.kazuhiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] ARM: configs: Add Milbeaut M10V defconfig
Hi,
On 2019/02/20 22:23, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> 2019年2月20日(水) 22:18 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:16 PM Masami Hiramatsu
>> <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> 2019年2月20日(水) 21:28 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 12:27 PM Sugaya, Taichi
>>>> <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2019/02/20 18:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:44 AM Sugaya Taichi
>>>>>> <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/milbeaut_m10v_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/milbeaut_m10v_defconfig
>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>> index 0000000..a263211
>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/milbeaut_m10v_defconfig
>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I no longer see anything here that should be turned off, but you
>>>>>> might want to run 'make savedefconfig' and use the output of that,
>>>>>> to make it easier to keep it up to date.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I got it, I use the output of 'make savedefconfig'.
>>>>> One question, is that OK to add some options on it?
>>>>> -Because "CONFIG_ARCH_MILBEAUT" was not listed.
>>>>
>>>> What I'd do here is to apply all the patches you want to get merged in
>>>> the next few releases before running 'savedefconfig' and use the output
>>>> of that.
>>>
>>> Let me check. Would you mean that the defconfig will include all those
>>> drivers configs, which will not appear at this moment?
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>>>> If you already know that you will need the options, including
>>>> them now means you don't have to update the defconfig file
>>>> as much in the future.
>>>
>>> I just concern that if other subsystem maintainer comments
>>> on the config name. Even in that case, can we just update the
>>> defconfig with new name?
>>
>> Yes, that's easy enough.
>
> OK, I got it :)
>
> Thank you!
>
Thank you for the detail. I got it too.
>>
>> Arnd
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists