linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] Mediatek MT8183 clock and scpsys support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:36:24 +0100
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        srv_heupstream@...iatek.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] Mediatek MT8183 clock and scpsys support



On 20/02/2019 20:18, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Weiyi Lu (2019-02-01 00:30:04)
>> This series is based on v5.0-rc1 and most of changes are extracted from series below
>> (clock/scpsys common changes for both MT8183 & MT6765)
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10528495/
>> (clock support of MT8183)
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10549891/
>>
>> The whole series is composed of
>> clock common changes for both MT8183 & MT6765 (PATCH 1-3),
>> scpsys common changes for both MT8183 & MT6765 (PATCH 4),
>> clock support of MT8183 (PATCH 5-8),
>> scpsys support of MT8183 (PATCH 9-11) and
>> resend a clock patch long time ago(PTACH 12).
> 
> What's the merge plan here? Do you want me to apply these patches to clk
> tree? Will someone be sending me a pull request for mediatek clk changes
> this cycle? It's getting pretty late for much of anything making this
> upcoming merge window.
> 

As far as I can see, the clock patches are independent, so I think it is OK to
take them. SCPSYS patches will go through my tree once they are in shape.

Do you prefer to get pull requests for clock patches? I wasn't aware of that.
But if you prefer that, we can find someone who prepares every merge window a
pull request.

Regards,
Matthias