[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190221093242.bhilzd6z54wukx4q@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:32:42 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Pass caller information to log_store().
On Thu 2019-02-21 11:22:57, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (02/16/19 19:59), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > /* insert record into the buffer, discard old ones, update heads */
> > -static int log_store(int facility, int level,
> > +static int log_store(u32 caller_id, int facility, int level,
> > enum log_flags flags, u64 ts_nsec,
> > const char *dict, u16 dict_len,
> > const char *text, u16 text_len)
>
> I counted nine.
>
> Dunno, we might want to just create a dummy struct and pass it
> around, instead of doing
>
> vprintk_emit (6 params)
> vprintk_store (6 params)
> log_output (7 params)
> log_store (9 params)
Yeah, it would make sense. I still dream about a bigger printk
code clean up. But let's see what comes from the realtime-related
patchset first.
Anyway, thanks for review.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists