[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190221114145.GC10737@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:41:45 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@...media-net.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Ying Xu <yinxu@...hat.com>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 01/24] bridge: do not add port to router list when
receives query with source 0.0.0.0
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:48:47PM +0100, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> *reminder*
>
> Am 18.02.2019 um 11:18 schrieb Sebastian Gottschall:
> >
> > Am 17.02.2019 um 17:48 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 03:29:22PM +0100, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> > > > according to user reports this patch will cause a serious
> > > > regression. igmp
> > > > snooping is not working anymore with this patch
> > > >
> > > > Am 02.11.2018 um 19:34 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > > > > 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections,
> > > > > please let me know.
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > [ Upstream commit 5a2de63fd1a59c30c02526d427bc014b98adf508 ]
> > > > >
> > > > > Based on RFC 4541, 2.1.1. IGMP Forwarding Rules
> > > > >
> > > > > The switch supporting IGMP snooping must maintain a list of
> > > > > multicast routers and the ports on which they are attached. This
> > > > > list can be constructed in any combination of the following ways:
> > > > >
> > > > > a) This list should be built by the snooping switch sending
> > > > > Multicast Router Solicitation messages as described in IGMP
> > > > > Multicast Router Discovery [MRDISC]. It may also snoop
> > > > > Multicast Router Advertisement messages sent by and to other
> > > > > nodes.
> > > > >
> > > > > b) The arrival port for IGMP Queries (sent by multicast routers)
> > > > > where the source address is not 0.0.0.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > We should not add the port to router list when receives
> > > > > query with source
> > > > > 0.0.0.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reported-by: Ying Xu <yinxu@...hat.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> > > > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> > > > > @@ -1420,7 +1420,15 @@ static void br_multicast_query_received(
> > > > > return;
> > > > > br_multicast_update_query_timer(br, query, max_delay);
> > > > > - br_multicast_mark_router(br, port);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Based on RFC4541, section 2.1.1 IGMP Forwarding Rules,
> > > > > + * the arrival port for IGMP Queries where the source address
> > > > > + * is 0.0.0.0 should not be added to router port list.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + if ((saddr->proto == htons(ETH_P_IP) && saddr->u.ip4) ||
> > > > > + (saddr->proto == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
> > > > > + !ipv6_addr_any(&saddr->u.ip6)))
> > > > > + br_multicast_mark_router(br, port);
> > > > > }
> > > > > static void br_ip4_multicast_query(struct net_bridge *br,
> > > Is this also a problem in 4.20? This patch went into 4.20-rc1, so it
> > > has been around for a while with no reported issues that I can find.
> > > Any pointers to the reports?
> >
> > i need to check this. i found this patch in 4.9, 4.14 and 4.4
> > the rest was picked up from the mailinglist. according to the git
> > sources of 4.20 and 5.0 the same code is in there as well
> >
> > i just got the report from users today and was able to reproduce it with
> > iptv streams. just by disabling the code it was working again.
Reminder of what?
If this is still an issue in 4.20, and 5.0-rc, there's nothing I can do.
Please work with the networking developers to resolve the issue and get
the fix merged into Linus's tree and then I will be glad to take the fix
into the stable trees.
If this is _not_ an issue with 4.20 and 5.0-rc, I need to know that as
well.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists