[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190221115020.12385-13-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:50:10 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 12/22] x86/fpu: Only write PKRU if it is different from current
Dave Hansen says that the `wrpkru' is more expensive than `rdpkru'. It
has a higher cycle cost and it's also practically a (light) speculation
barrier.
As an optimisation read the current PKRU value and only write the new
one if it is different.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
index 43c029cdc3fe8..2d3adeb268e38 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
@@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ static inline void __write_pkru(u32 pkru)
{
u32 ecx = 0, edx = 0;
+ /*
+ * WRPKRU is relatively expensive compared to RDPKRU.
+ * Avoid WRPKRU when it would not change the value.
+ */
+ if (pkru == __read_pkru())
+ return;
/*
* "wrpkru" instruction. Loads contents in EAX to PKRU,
* requires that ecx = edx = 0.
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists