[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190221121340.GA7918@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:13:40 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, peterhuewe@....de,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] tpm: Fix the type of the return value in
calc_tpm2_event_size()
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:00:42AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 08:31:59AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 10:23:00AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> > > calc_tpm2_event_size() has an invalid signature because
> > > it returns a 'size_t' where as its signature says that
> > > it returns 'int'.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4d23cc323cdb ("tpm: add securityfs support for TPM 2.0 firmware event log")
> > > Suggested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> >
> > Two remarks:
> >
> > - git config user.name "Yue Haibing"
> > - "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org" before the fixes tag.
>
> 'Theoretical' bug fixes are not suitable for stable
AFAIK there is no hard rule here. For this one line change I think it
makes sense to backport it even if it is only for avoiding conflicts
with future backports.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists