linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Provide fwnode for the USB connector

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VeVKs=Knu-H34qY5EmUgKd61+yQ5QbkOrOGv+3Nv+yW_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:21:58 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Provide fwnode for
 the USB connector

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:56 PM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:46:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:00 PM Heikki Krogerus
> > <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In ACPI, and now also in DT, the USB connectors usually have
> > > their own device nodes. In case of USB Type-C, those
> > > connector (port) nodes are child nodes of the controller or
> > > PHY device, in our case the fusb302. The software fwnodes
> > > allow us to create a similar child node for fusb302 that
> > > represents the connector also on Intel CHT.
> > >
> > > This makes it possible replace the fusb302 specific device
> > > properties which were deprecated with the common USB
> > > connector properties that tcpm.c is able to use directly.
> > >
> >
> > This doesn't apply to our for-next branch.
>
> Please read the cover-letter ;-)

Ah, sure.
I did it once and even remove from our patchwork queue, but then
forgot details. Now it's all clear.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko