linux-kernel - Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190221153415.GL11489@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:34:15 -0800
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
        Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
        lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees

On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 01:28:35PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> The block/*, loop/* and scsi/* tests in blktests do seem to be in
> pretty good shape.  The nvme, nvmeof, and srp tests are *definitely*
> not as mature.

Can you say more about this later part. What would you like to see more
of for nvme tests for instance?

It sounds like a productive session would include tracking our:

  a) sour spots
  b) who's already working on these
  c) gather volutneers for these sour spots

 Luis