[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190222005812.04c5940c693b14cfdbe6ede7@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:58:12 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kprobe: Do not use uaccess functions to access
kernel memory that can fault
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:36:25 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:52:52 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Basically OK to me.
> > Could you use probe_kernel_read() in this context, since probe_mem_read() is a
> > wrapper function for template code.
> >
> > With that change,
> >
> > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>
> This already hit Linus's tree. I was able to reproduce the crash, so I
> streamlined it. I should have still pushed more for your ack first.
> Sorry about that.
Oh, never mind. That seems urgent issue for kprobe event.
Thank you very much for fixing it!
> For some reason, I thought the change was in the generic probe code,
> and accepted the probe_mem_read(). Anyway, did you want to send a patch
> to change it to probe_kernel_read(), for the merge window?
No problem.
> > And for the long term, I need to find more efficient (or smarter) way to do it,
> > like strnlen_user() does.
>
> Agreed.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists