[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190222054601.4396-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 05:46:01 +0000
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
To: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@...ana.ai>
CC: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next] habanalabs: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
Fixes: 0feaf86d4e69 ("habanalabs: add virtual memory and MMU modules")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
---
drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c
index 9236e52852c6..9e3491dc3b55 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int alloc_device_memory(struct hl_ctx *ctx, struct hl_mem_in *args,
spin_lock(&vm->idr_lock);
handle = idr_alloc(&vm->phys_pg_pack_handles, phys_pg_pack, 1, 0,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ GFP_ATOMIC);
spin_unlock(&vm->idr_lock);
if (handle < 0) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists