linux-kernel - Re: BUG: optimized kprobes illegal instructions in v4.19 stable kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:25:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:     "Russell King, ARM Linux" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lttng <lttng@...iableembeddedsystems.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: BUG: optimized kprobes illegal instructions in v4.19 stable
 kernels

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 07:17:11PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Feb 21, 2019, at 7:10 PM, Russell King, ARM Linux linux@...linux.org.uk wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:02:57PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> Hi Arnd, Russell, Linus,
> >> 
> >> Can we ensure the arm32 kprobes fix I submitted gets upstream before 5.0 final ?
> >> It takes care of an illegal instruction issue with optimized kprobes on arm32.
> >> 
> >> Here is the current state of default kprobes configuration on arm32:
> >> using them will trigger illegal instruction OOPS on v5.0-rc7, 4.19.24,
> >> v4.14.102.
> >> 
> >> My fix is in "accepted" state in the arm patch tracking system:
> >> 
> >> https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8834/1
> >> 
> >> Should I send it directly to Linus as well ?
> > 
> > Accepted means it's in my tree pending to be sent to Linus.  It should
> > now be in mainline.  Have you checked?
> 
> Hrm, why did I not see it earlier today... it's embarrassing.
> 
> It's there indeed, all is good!
> 
> Greg, you should be able to pick it into the stable kernels now.

What is the git commit id of it?

thanks,

greg k-h