linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] soc: qcom: socinfo: Expose custom attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a65d1ec4-8078-a878-3db0-084d1504c4df@free.fr>
Date:   Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:54:25 +0100
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] soc: qcom: socinfo: Expose custom attributes

On 21/02/2019 16:57, Bjorn Andersson wrote:

> On Thu 21 Feb 04:18 PST 2019, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 10:28:29AM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>> 
>>> The Qualcomm socinfo provides a number of additional attributes,
>>> add these to the socinfo driver and expose them via debugfs
>>> functionality.
>> 
>> What is the use case for these attributes ? I fear they will be used in
>> production systems, and that would require debugfs in production, which
>> isn't a good idea. If you need to expose those attributes for anything
>> else than debugging then we need a proper API, likely sysfs-based.
> 
> The use case of these attributes, beyond development/debugging, are
> unfortunately somewhat unknown and is the reason why they where moved to
> debugfs from the earlier attempts to upstream this.
> 
> I think the production requirements at hand prohibits debugfs to be
> present, so attributes that are required beyond development/debugging
> purposes would have to be migrated out to sysfs - but the idea here is
> that such migration would have come with the missing motivation to add
> them there today.

On a tangential note, I saw the following message when using PCIe:

atl1c 0000:01:00.0: vpd r/w failed.  This is likely a firmware bug on this device.  Contact the card vendor for a firmware update
pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out

Is this in any way related to custom attributes?

Regards.