[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190222130014.GY32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:00:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:21:28PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > What I do object to is a model that's weaker than any possible sane
> > hardware.
>
> Not the first time I hear you calling this out. And inevitably, every
> time, other slogans come to my mind: "C is not an assembly language",
But it bloody well should be ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists