[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1550844620-6550-3-git-send-email-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 22:10:20 +0800
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jack@...e.cz
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] loop: set GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part()
Commit 0da03cab87e6
("loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()") moves
blkdev_reread_part() out of the loop_ctl_mutex. However,
GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN is set before __blkdev_reread_part(). As a result,
__blkdev_reread_part() will fail the check of GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN and
will not rescan the loop device to delete all partitions.
Below are steps to reproduce the issue:
step1 # dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.raw bs=1M count=100
step2 # losetup -P /dev/loop0 tmp.raw
step3 # parted /dev/loop0 mklabel gpt
step4 # parted -a none -s /dev/loop0 mkpart primary 64s 1
step5 # losetup -d /dev/loop0
Step5 will not be able to delete /dev/loop0p1 (introduced by step4) and
there is below kernel warning message:
[ 464.414043] __loop_clr_fd: partition scan of loop0 failed (rc=-22)
This patch sets GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part().
Fixes: 0da03cab87e6 ("loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()")
Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
Changed since v1:
* move the setting of lo->lo_state to Lo_unbound after partscan has finished as well
(suggested by Jan Kara)
Changed since v2:
* Put the code inline in __loop_clr_fd() but not introduce new function
(suggested by Jan Kara)
drivers/block/loop.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 7908673..7ec3297 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1089,16 +1089,12 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(bdev->bd_disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
}
mapping_set_gfp_mask(filp->f_mapping, gfp);
- lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
/* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev;
lo_number = lo->lo_number;
- lo->lo_flags = 0;
- if (!part_shift)
- lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
@@ -1121,6 +1117,23 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
/* Device is gone, no point in returning error */
err = 0;
}
+
+ /*
+ * lo->lo_state is set to Lo_unbound here after above partscan has
+ * finished.
+ *
+ * There cannot be anybody else entering __loop_clr_fd() as
+ * lo->lo_backing_file is already cleared and Lo_rundown state
+ * protects us from all the other places trying to change the 'lo'
+ * device.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+ lo->lo_flags = 0;
+ if (!part_shift)
+ lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
+ lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
+ mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+
/*
* Need not hold loop_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
* Calling fput holding loop_ctl_mutex triggers a circular
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists