linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] media: vicodec: avoic clang frame size warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:50:03 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     natechancellor@...il.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] media: vicodec: avoic clang frame size warning

Clang-9 makes some different inlining decisions compared to gcc, which
leads to a warning about a possible stack overflow problem when building
with CONFIG_KASAN, including when setting asan-stack=0, which avoids
most other frame overflow warnings:

drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c:673:12: error: stack frame size of 2224 bytes in function 'encode_plane'

Manually adding noinline_for_stack annotations in those functions
called by encode_plane() or decode_plane() that require a significant
amount of kernel stack makes this impossible to happen with any
compiler.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
v2: annotate fwht() as well, add a comment
---
 drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c | 29 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c b/drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c
index d1d6085da9f1..a9ae11783c90 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c
@@ -46,8 +46,12 @@ static const uint8_t zigzag[64] = {
 	63,
 };
 
-
-static int rlc(const s16 *in, __be16 *output, int blocktype)
+/*
+ * noinline_for_stack to work around
+ * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38809
+ */
+static int noinline_for_stack
+rlc(const s16 *in, __be16 *output, int blocktype)
 {
 	s16 block[8 * 8];
 	s16 *wp = block;
@@ -106,8 +110,8 @@ static int rlc(const s16 *in, __be16 *output, int blocktype)
  * This function will worst-case increase rlc_in by 65*2 bytes:
  * one s16 value for the header and 8 * 8 coefficients of type s16.
  */
-static u16 derlc(const __be16 **rlc_in, s16 *dwht_out,
-		 const __be16 *end_of_input)
+static noinline_for_stack u16
+derlc(const __be16 **rlc_in, s16 *dwht_out, const __be16 *end_of_input)
 {
 	/* header */
 	const __be16 *input = *rlc_in;
@@ -240,8 +244,9 @@ static void dequantize_inter(s16 *coeff)
 			*coeff <<= *quant;
 }
 
-static void fwht(const u8 *block, s16 *output_block, unsigned int stride,
-		 unsigned int input_step, bool intra)
+static void noinline_for_stack
+fwht(const u8 *block, s16 *output_block, unsigned int stride,
+      unsigned int input_step, bool intra)
 {
 	/* we'll need more than 8 bits for the transformed coefficients */
 	s32 workspace1[8], workspace2[8];
@@ -373,7 +378,8 @@ static void fwht(const u8 *block, s16 *output_block, unsigned int stride,
  * Furthermore values can be negative... This is just a version that
  * works with 16 signed data
  */
-static void fwht16(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int stride, int intra)
+static void noinline_for_stack
+fwht16(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int stride, int intra)
 {
 	/* we'll need more than 8 bits for the transformed coefficients */
 	s32 workspace1[8], workspace2[8];
@@ -456,7 +462,8 @@ static void fwht16(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int stride, int intra)
 	}
 }
 
-static void ifwht(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int intra)
+static noinline_for_stack void
+ifwht(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int intra)
 {
 	/*
 	 * we'll need more than 8 bits for the transformed coefficients
@@ -604,9 +611,9 @@ static int var_inter(const s16 *old, const s16 *new)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int decide_blocktype(const u8 *cur, const u8 *reference,
-			    s16 *deltablock, unsigned int stride,
-			    unsigned int input_step)
+static noinline_for_stack int
+decide_blocktype(const u8 *cur, const u8 *reference, s16 *deltablock,
+		 unsigned int stride, unsigned int input_step)
 {
 	s16 tmp[64];
 	s16 old[64];
-- 
2.20.0